CT chest abdomen-pelvis (protocol)
At the time the article was created Joachim Feger had no recorded disclosures.
Last revised:
3 Jul 2024, Arlene Campos ◉
Disclosures:
At the time the article was last revised Arlene Campos had no financial relationships to ineligible companies to disclose.
Revisions:
6 times, by 3 contributors - see full revision history and disclosures
Systems:
Sections:
Tags:
Synonyms:
- CT chest-abdomen-pelvis protocol
- CT CAP (chest, abdomen and pelvis)
- Chest-abdomen-pelvis CT protocol
- CT protocol: chest-abdomen-pelvis
- Chest/abdomen/pelvis CT protocol
The CT chest-abdomen-pelvis protocol serves as an outline for an examination of the trunk covering the chest, abdomen and pelvis. It is one of the most common CT examinations conducted in routine and emergencies. It can be combined with a CT angiogram.
Note: This article aims to frame a general concept of a CT protocol for the assessment of the chest, abdomen and pelvis. Protocol specifics will vary depending on CT scanner type, specific hardware and software, radiologist and perhaps referrer preference, patient factors e.g. implants, specific indications.
For specific protocols for the investigation of chest, liver, pancreas, adrenals and kidneys or the aorta please refer to the specific protocols.
A typical CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis might look like as follows:
On this page:
- Indications
- Technique
- Practical points
- Related articles
- References
Indications
Typical indications include an evaluation or monitoring of the following 1-3 :
- suspected tumors or fluid collections of the chest, abdomen and pelvis
- diagnosis and staging of malignancies
- traumatic injuries
- infections and inflammatory conditions
- patients with sepsis or fever of unknown origin
- evaluation of vascular abnormalities
- postoperative follow-up
- pre and posttransplant evaluation
- congenital abnormalities
Purpose
The purpose of a CT chest-abdomen-pelvis includes but is not limited to the detection, characterization and localization of the following conditions 1-3 :
- tumors, metastasis and lymph nodes
- air collections outside the lungs and the gastrointestinal tract
- abnormal or organ calcifications
- abnormal fluid collections including hemorrhage or soft tissue edema
- blunt and penetrating abdominal and pelvic injuries
- organ manifestations of systemic disease above and below the diaphragm
- multiphasic protocols:
- arterial phase: hypervascular tumors and vascular lesions
- venous phase: depiction of hepatic metastases, venous thrombosis etc.
Technique
- patient position
- supine position, body centered within the gantry
- both arms elevated
- as suggested by the automatic exposure control
- above the lung apices to the symphysis
- includes lung apices and pubic symphysis
- in the case of a multiphasic scan or split acquisition, there will be different scan ranges
- field of view (FOV): 350 mm (should be adjusted to increase in-plane resolution)
- slice thickness: ≤0.75 mm, interval: ≤0.5 mm
- reconstruction algorithm: soft tissue, bone
- positive contrast agent (abscesses, infectious conditions): as per preparation guide
- neutral contrast agent (oncologic or vascular conditions): 1000 ml water 20-30 min before the scan
- contrast volume: 70-100ml (0.1 mL/kg) with 30-40 mL saline chaser at 3-5 mL/s
- bolus tracking: abdominal aorta
- arterial phase: minimal scan delay
- portal venous phase: 30-50 seconds after the arterial phase or 60-80 seconds after contrast injection
- contrast volume: 70-100ml (0.1 mL/kg) with 30-40 mL saline chaser at 3 mL/s
- portal venous acquisition: 60-80 sec after contrast injection
- 65-80 ml contrast media at 2,5 mL/s
- 15-40 ml contrast media and 30-50 ml saline chaser at 2,5-3 mL/s starting 40 sec after contrast injection
- venous acquisition: 60-80 sec after contrast injection
- single breath-hold: inspiration
- if a single breath is not possible consider dual-phase over chest and abdomen-pelvis
- axial images: strictly axial to the body axis
- coronal images: strictly coronal to the body axis
- sagittal images: strictly sagittal to the body axis
- slice thickness: soft tissue ≤3 mm, bone ≤2 mm overlap 20-40%
Practical points
- patient positioning before scanning might reduce patient dose and facilitate multiplanar reconstructions
- depending on the exact indication the scan might require an extension of the scan field
- consider 30 ml intravenous contrast media followed by saline chaser 5 min before the scan
- dose optimization 5-7
- use iterative reconstruction algorithms if available
- adjust expected CTDIvol and noise to patient size
- make use of automatic exposure control
- consider employing manufacturer-specific protocols for best results
- consider dual-energy and split-bolus protocols instead of multiple acquisitions
References
- 1. Rastogi S, Singh R, Borse R et al. Use of Multiphase CT Protocols in 18 Countries: Appropriateness and Radiation Doses. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021;72(3):381-7. doi:10.1177/0846537119888390 - Pubmed
- 2. Holly B & Steenburg S. Multidetector CT of Blunt Traumatic Venous Injuries in the Chest, Abdomen, and Pelvis. Radiographics. 2011;31(5):1415-24. doi:10.1148/rg.315105221 - Pubmed
- 3. Bae K. Intravenous Contrast Medium Administration and Scan Timing at CT: Considerations and Approaches. Radiology. 2010;256(1):32-61. doi:10.1148/radiol.10090908 - Pubmed
- 4. E. Lekgabe, N. Tran, W. Cheung et al. Single-Pass CT Chest/Abdomen/Pelvis for Oncology Patients: Effect on Radiation Dose and Image Quality. European Congress of Radiology - ECR 2015. 2015. https://epos.myesr.org/poster/esr/ecr2015/C-1895
- 5. Mayo-Smith W, Hara A, Mahesh M, Sahani D, Pavlicek W. How I Do It: Managing Radiation Dose in CT. Radiology. 2014;273(3):657-72. doi:10.1148/radiol.14132328 - Pubmed
- 6. Kalra M, Sodickson A, Mayo-Smith W. CT Radiation: Key Concepts for Gentle and Wise Use. Radiographics. 2015;35(6):1706-21. doi:10.1148/rg.2015150118 - Pubmed
- 7. Gonzalez-Guindalini F, Ferreira Botelho M, Töre H, Ahn R, Gordon L, Yaghmai V. MDCT of Chest, Abdomen, and Pelvis Using Attenuation-Based Automated Tube Voltage Selection in Combination with Iterative Reconstruction: An Intrapatient Study of Radiation Dose and Image Quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(5):1075-82. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.10354 - Pubmed